| I
once heard Clarkson say on Top Gear that these days there are no bad
cars. I tend to agree, there are cars you like and some you don't, but
generally they are are not actually bad.
My experience of the
Sierra says that it was a bad car. I had one of the face-lift ones with
the slot grille and the more shaped headlamps. It was a red 2.0L GL on
an E plate (1989?). It was my company car in the years when I
covered 30,000+ miles a year on the motorways of the North West of
England as a Dorothy Perkins Area Manager, a job I did for 12 years.
Most of the time I chose Cavaliers for my company car and they were
excellent, 100% reliable, fast, fun to drive and good for 100,000 miles,
I did more than a third of a million miles in Cavaliers without any
trouble at all. One time though I was a bit bored with Cavaliers and
decided to try the competition, big mistake.
The Sierra was just a re-bodied Cortina,
and the Cortina
while excellent for its day, was not a car for the 90s. The two litre
four cylinder engine was
old and felt like it, the chassis was a nightmare, lethal on corners and
unstable in a straight line. The seats felt big and comfortable for the
first 20 minutes or so after which they broke your back. The dashboard
design was so bad that I had to have an extra warning light fitted
because you couldn't see the turn indicator light, it was obscured by
the steering wheel and to finish the picture it was spectacularly
unreliable. The local Ford dealer came to hate me I took it back so
often. My company fleet manager used to save budget by making us keep
cars well over the mileage limit. This one was changed the day it was
due, to my great relief I got back into a Cavalier. |
|